In a democratic society, political awareness is not merely a right, but a duty of every citizen. Yet, an alarming trend of political ignorance threatens the very heart and ideology of democracy. When citizens are uninformed about political issues and candidates, they risk making ill-informed decisions that can lead to the election of unqualified leaders who may not truly represent the interests of the people. Political ignorance also paves the way for misinformation and fake news to thrive, consequently undermining the integrity of democratic institutions. Furthermore, a disengaged populace is less likely to hold their elected officials accountable, fostering a climate of opacity and corruption in the upper echelons of our government. In light of all this, comprehensive political and civic education reform indisputably stands out as the most effective remedy for addressing the scourge of political ignorance in our democracy.
When citizens are uninformed about political issues and candidates, they tend to make hasty decisions when it comes to choosing their leaders. This naivete can result in the election of individuals who are not qualified or who do not represent the best interests of the people. U.S. voters have consistently elected less experienced candidates in presidential elections since 1996 (Ryosuke 1). However, we cannot completely attribute this blame to the general populace. Rather, this phenomenon of a politically disengaged population can be directly attributed to the complexities and nuances of the American election system. According to the renowned sociologist Michael Schudson, "Citizens in other countries need only dog paddle to be in the political swim; in the United States, they need the skills of a scuba diver" (Schudson 18). In this evidence, “dog paddle” refers to a swimming style in which minimal technique is required, while “scuba diver” refers to a style of swimming in which hundreds of hours of training is necessary. This comparison helps to emphasize the idea that the election system is very confusing and filled with complexities that require detailed understanding, much like scuba diving. The American Electoral College is a body of representatives who formally cast votes for the election of the President and Vice President of the United States. Each state is allocated a certain number of electors based on its population, and the candidate who wins the most popular votes in a state receives all of that state's electoral votes. However, this “winner-takes-all” system can lead to confusion and controversy since the candidate who wins the popular vote may not necessarily win the electoral college. For example, in the 2016 presidential election, Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, but Donald Trump won the electoral college and thus became the President. This system often leaves voters feeling like their votes don't matter and can be difficult to understand for those who are not acquainted with the US political system. This disconnect between the popular vote and the outcome of elections can exacerbate the problem of electing officials who do not truly represent the opinions of their voters. When voters feel disenfranchised or believe their votes do not count, they may become disengaged from the political process altogether. This lack of participation weakens democracy by diminishing the representative power of elected officials and undermining the principle of representative government. As a result, the foundation of democracy itself is threatened, since “democracy depends upon informed and engaged citizens” to function effectively (Center for Strategic and International Studies 2022).
The prevalence of political ignorance, particularly among those who rely on social media for news consumption, further worsens the spread of misinformation and fake news. This trend undermines the integrity of democratic institutions and is detrimental to society as a whole. Research indicates that a significant portion of U.S. adults, approximately 18%, primarily obtain their political news from social media platforms, where misinformation often spreads unchecked (Pew Research Center 2021). Due to this, individuals who depend on social media for news are less likely to closely follow elections and current events, leading to a lack of political knowledge. These citizens are also more susceptible to exposure to unverified claims and misinformation, such as the “false narratives surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic” (Pew Research Center 2021). This reliance on social media for news consumption results in a diminished understanding of political facts and concepts compared to those who obtain their news from more traditional sources like news websites/apps or cable TV. Furthermore, individuals who rely on social media are less likely to seek information from multiple sources, “contributing to a narrowing of their perspectives and potentially reinforcing biases,” (Ciampaglia 2018). This phenomenon perpetuates an information gap across various demographics, with age, education level, income, race, gender, and partisan affiliation being significant determinants of news knowledge. When these uninformed people go to vote, they don’t know what they are voting for and are undermining the integrity of these institutions by making uninformed decisions. Over time, this will lead to a lack of trust in the government and other democratic institutions, facilitating the smothering of democratic ideals in the United States.
Arguably the most detrimental aspect of political disengagement is the societal trend where a disconnected populace is less inclined to hold their elected officials accountable for their actions and promises, which fosters a climate of opacity and corruption within the upper echelons of our government, undermining the democratic values that the United States was founded upon. A study conducted in 2020 by MIT Sloan Assistant Economics Professor Charles Angelucci and Columbia University’s Andrea Prat has highlighted disparities in voter awareness of news stories across various demographics in the US, including age, gender, race, partisan preference, and socioeconomic status. The findings suggest that certain groups, such as older, wealthy white males, tend to be more informed about current events, “disproportionately writing policy decisions in their favor,” (Baskin 2020). Moreover, women and minorities are shown to have lower levels of awareness, indicating a need for targeted messaging to bridge this gap. This comprehensive study also reveals a tendency among voters to be less aware of stories unfavorable to their own political party, further worsening the problem. It is important to understand the widespread influence that political ignorance has on American democracy, emphasizing that a citizenry without basic civic knowledge is vulnerable to manipulation, propaganda, and political dysfunction. This erosion of understanding weakens the foundation of democracy, transforming elections into mere popularity contests devoid of informed debate and meaningful choices, which we have seen in the past couple of presidential debates. Instead of actively holding leaders accountable, citizens risk becoming passive observers, allowing powerful interests to exploit the knowledge vacuum. It is imperative to advocate for a revitalized civics education, producing classes that instill not only factual knowledge but also critical thinking skills.
Comprehensive political and civic education reform unequivocally emerges as the most potent antidote to the poison of political ignorance plaguing our democracy. Without a doubt, the peril of uninformed citizens casting their votes blindly cannot be overstated. When citizens lack basic knowledge about political issues and candidates, they become easy prey for demagogues, paving the way for the rise to power of unqualified leaders who do not genuinely represent the interests of the people. Furthermore, political ignorance serves as fertile soil for the rampant growth of misinformation and fake news, corroding the very foundations of democratic institutions and eroding public trust in governance, all while accountability wanes in the absence of an informed electorate. It is only through comprehensive political and civic education reform that we can equip American citizens with the critical thinking skills and knowledge necessary to navigate the complexities of modern politics. By empowering individuals to discern fact from fiction and fostering a sense of civic duty and engagement, such reform is not merely an option but imperative for safeguarding the integrity and vitality of our democracy. Anything less would be a betrayal of the principles upon which our nation was founded, relegating democracy to a facade while corruption and ignorance become supreme forces in the bureaucratic ranks of our government.
All in all, political ignorance plays a key role in the fall of our democratic institutions through misinformation, a lack of participation, and a general loss of accountability. By empowering future generations to navigate the complexities of governance and think critically about political issues, it is imperative to rebuild and educate the populace about a democracy where information serves as a tool for empowerment rather than manipulation, and citizens are active participants in shaping the nation's trajectory, not pawns that political leaders use to gain support for their causes.
Works Cited
Aliyya Swaby, Annie Waldman. “How to Fix America’s Confusing Voting System.” ProPublica, 12 Sept. 2022, www.propublica.org/article/improve-voter-turnout-solutions-accessibility. Accessed 16 Feb. 2024.
Angelucci, Charles. “How Much Do Americans Know about the News?” The Hill, The Hill, 26 Oct. 2020, thehill.com/opinion/education/522725-how-much-do-americans-know-about-the-news/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
“Civics for Adults: A Guide for Civics Content Providers.” Csis.org, 2022, www.csis.org/analysis/civics-adults-guide-civics-content-providers. Accessed 16 Feb. 2024.
Cole, Jonathan R. “The Atlantic.” The Atlantic, theatlantic, 8 Nov. 2016, www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/11/ignorance-does-not-lead-to-election-bliss/506894/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
“Democracy and Decision.” Cambridge University Press EBooks, 26 Mar. 1993, www.cambridge.org/core/books/democracy-and-decision/F6B9DCA136CB2DF4E73A0AC7BC6BE2BE. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
Giovanni Luca Ciampaglia, et al. “Biases Make People Vulnerable to Misinformation Spread by Social Media.” Scientific American, 21 June 2018, www.scientificamerican.com/article/biases-make-people-vulnerable-to-misinformation-spread-by-social-media/. Accessed 17 Feb. 2024.
Pew Research Center. “4. Americans Who Mainly Got News via Social Media Knew Less about Politics and Current Events, Heard More about Some Unproven Stories.” Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project, 22 Feb. 2021, www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2021/02/22/americans-who-mainly-got-news-via-social-media-knew-less-about-politics-and-current-events-heard-more-about-some-unproven-stories/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
Ryosuke, Okazawa. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Why Do Voters Elect Less Qualified Candidates? 2018.
Schudson, Michael . “America’s Ignorant Voters on JSTOR.” Jstor.org, 2024, www.jstor.org/stable/40260033?read-now=1&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
Sloan, MIT. “Voters’ Knowledge of Political News Varies Widely, Study Shows | MIT Sloan.” MIT Sloan, 13 Oct. 2020, mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/voters-knowledge-political-news-varies-widely-study-shows. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
The Regulatory Review. “The Problem of Political Ignorance | the Regulatory Review.” The Regulatory Review, 3 Feb. 2014, www.theregreview.org/2014/02/03/03-somin-political-ignorance/. Accessed 15 Feb. 2024.
Opmerkingen